Abstract
The study is devoted to the analysis of university forms of social innovation, necessary during the war and for the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. Methods. In the process of research the methods of theoretical search, historical, abstract-logical, comparative and descriptive were used. Results. An assessment of possible forms of development of social innovations on the basis of higher education institutions (HEIs) of Ukraine, namely social entrepreneurship, outreach activities of universities, and socially oriented models of education is given. An analysis of the rating higher education institutions of Ukraine regarding the implementation of social innovations in the scientific and educational process is carried out. Examples of the implementation of socially oriented learning outcomes that provide war-related societal demands are presented. Scientific and methodical recommendations for higher education institutions on improving the quality of the scientific and educational process with the help of social innovations during the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine have been developed. Conclusions. The results of the study demonstrate the increasing role of the HEIs in the implementation of social innovations as a method of post-war reconstruction of Ukraine and establishment of partnership relations with external participants, including at the international arena
Keywords
higher education institution, social innovation, socially oriented education, recommendations, post-war reconstruction of Ukraine
References
1. Abreu, M., Demirel, P., Grinevich, V., & Karataş-Özkan, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial practices in research-intensive and teaching-led universities. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 695-717.
2. Berkeley SkyDeck. (2023). Retrieved from https://skydeck.berkeley.edu/.
3. Cruz, P. (2018). Social innovation and higher education in the BRICS (1): A background overview. Rio de Janeiro: BRICS Policy Center.
4. Durkheim, E. (1933). The division of labor (G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
5. Durkheim, E. (1960). Sociologist: De la division du travail social. Presses Universitaires de France.
6. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4.
7. Lebish, M. (2018). STU wins Ashoka Award for innovation in higher education. Retrieved from https://www.stu.edu/news/stu-wins-ashoka-award-for-innovation-in-higher-education/.
8. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2023). Retrieved from https://mon.gov.ua/ua/osvita/profesijnotehnichna-osvita/reforma-profesijnoyi-osviti/derzhavno-privatnepartnerstvo-ta-dualna-osvita/dualna-osvita.
9. MIT delta (2023). Retrieved from https://entrepreneurship.mit.edu/accelerator/program/
10. Momot, N. (2022). Development of the educational process in war-time through dual education. Scientific Notes of “KROK” University, 3(67), 103-113. doi: 10.31732/2663-2209-2022-67-103-113.
11. Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Hillier, J., & Haddock, S. V. (2009). Social innovation and territorial development. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
12. Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Rushanara, A., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters, and how it can be accelerated. Retrieved from https://youngfoundation.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Social-Innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated-March-2007.pdf?x55643.
13. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. Retrieved from https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/The-Open-Book-of-Social-Innovationg.pdf.
14. OECD. (2009). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/fr/cfe/leed/forum-social-innovations.htm.
15. OECD. (2011). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/social-economy/social-entrepreneurship.htm.
16. Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242511521_Rediscovering_Social_Innovation
17. Rothaermel, F.T., Agung, S.D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtm023.
18. The Young Foundation. (2012). Retrieved from https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/TEPSIE.D1.1.Report.DefiningSocialInnovation.Part-1-defining-social-innovation.pdf.
19. Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K.B., Doll, C.N.H., & Kraines, S.B. (2014). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science and Public Policy, 41(2), 151–179. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct044.
20. Urdari, C., Farcas, T., & Tiron Tudor, A. (2017). Assessing the legitimacy of HEIs’ contributions to society: The perspective of international rankings. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(2), 191–215. doi: 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2015-0108.
21. Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Allen and Unwin.
22. Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), article number 2.
23. Yatsun, O.M. (2018). Higher education as an agent of social innovation. Retrieved from http://protedu.org/profspilka.kiev.ua-publikacii-novyny-4834-vischa-osvta-yak-agent-socalnih-nnovacy-html.
